1.877.794.6722 The Race Club Search
Gary Hall Presents The Race Club Swim Camp

Life Is Worth Swimming

Swimming Efficiently

What does that mean, exactly? To many coaches, swimming efficiently is analogous to distance per stroke. But that is not quite right. Swimming efficiency is really more appropriately defined by the body’s speed in the water versus the energy expended to reach that speed. Here are some examples of what I mean.

In the 200 meter freestyle, former world record holder Pieter Van den Hoogenband would take 38 or 39 strokes per 50 meters, while Ian Thorpe or Michael Phelps would take around 34 strokes per 50 meters. Obviously, Thorpe and Phelps are getting greater distance per stroke, but are they also more efficient?

In the 50 meter freestyle, world record holder Cesar Cielo would take about 34 strokes while former world record holder, Eamon Sullivan would take about 38 strokes for the same distance. Same question.

When we examine efficiency more closely, we see that it really boils down to the same three physical properties that govern all of our swimming techniques, laws of drag, motion and inertia. At The Race Club, we refer often to these three fundamentals. Ultimately, our swimming speed is determined not just by technique, but by fitness, power, mental toughness, fatigue, among other things, so we cannot say that efficiency is based on technique alone. But if we assume that we have a given level of fitness, power, mental toughness, etc at any moment in time, our technique then really becomes the key factor in determining our efficiency.

We often see, particularly in women, a significant change in body shape as the swimmer ages. In some cases, in spite of significant gains in strength (power), race times don’t improve significantly. Most likely, it is the increase in drag caused by the larger frame that results in the speed not increasing. Sometimes the change in body shape necessitates a change in technique or event focus. We often see swimmers scale down their events with age to shorter races. This may have more to do with increased drag than it does with changing workout ethics.

Put into the simplest terms, in order to become more efficient swimmers, we must reduce drag as much as possible; not just off of starts and turns, but through every stroke cycle. We must learn to use our bodies in order to maximize the propulsive forces we can generate with each stroke for whatever level of power we have. Finally, we must be able to sustain as close to a constant speed as possible.

In the above examples, it is likely that Thorpe and Phelps would rely on a stronger kick in order to try to sustain their body speed, while Sullivan and Van den Hoogenband would rely more on a higher stroke rate.

There are different ways to achieve greater efficiency in swimming. It is not just about distance per stroke. Part of our job at the Race Club Camp is to figure out what techniques will allow you to maximize your swimming efficiency for a given event at this particular stage of your life. We look forward to seeing you down here soon!

Yours in Swimming,

Gary Sr.

  • James Stuart

    Well its hard to say really but one thing is, I remember during at Barcelona Olympics in 1992, Popov beat Biondi during 50 free final – Popov has two fewer strokes than Biondi to win gold medal. How you explain that? God, wish I go to race club mmm

    • http://www.aquadonis.ch Nico Messer

      First we should mention that Popov has never been “fast” off the blocks. If you watch most of his races, you’ll actually notice that 90% of the time at the 15m mark he’s behind everyone else. The thing with Popov and why he was so dominant on the 50 and 100 free for such a long time is that he was able to have a fast turnover while at the same time keeping a better distance per stroke than his competitors. This is part of the reason why he would be behind off the dive but he also was one of the few swimmers that actually wouldn’t slow down going into the wall as his technique would allow him to hold “the same” speed almost throughout his whole race. If you look at Gary Jr. race in Athens I would say we can see the same situation. So I guess that’s really the main point we can/should learn from this post and Gary Sr. probably wanted to let you know about.

  • Matthew Gamelo

    From the videos I’ve seen of Popov racing, I noticed that he also stays under the water longer after the dive compared to the others in a 50 free. One should take into account the distance off the dive when looking at stroke counts for certain races.

    • http://www.aquadonis.ch Nico Messer

      That’s most certainly something you have to take into account if you simply going to count the number of strokes each athletes takes for his race and not on the “raw” stroke rate.

      Another thing you need to be aware off is that just because Michael Phelps is able to stay under 12-15m off each turn, this might not be the most efficient and fastest way for you! It’s not about how long you can stay under but how fast you are at the 15m mark. There’s no point in staying under only for the looks if you loose 0.5s compared to your competitors over 15m.

      • James Stuart

        He is so fast on 15m mark due to his powerful, bendy legs mmm its that correct or what?

  • Stratocaster

    It was measured/reported in Swimmer Magazine that when Popov beat Biondi in that 50 free, Biondi used 33 watts of propulsive force while Popov only used 24 watts. That was 30% less force than Biondi to go faster! Really emphasizes the importance of reducing drag through stroke technique efficiency verses trying to increase power, since watts is a measure of power.

    • James Stuart

      Incredible! how he do that?

    • http://www.theraceclub.com Gary Sr

      That would not surprise me. Some of our drag is inherent in our shape, while some of the drag is induced by our body position and limb motions. The latter part can be reduced. What is so interesting about swimming is that it is a sport of compromise. For every feature that may help in one sense, it can also hurt in another.
      Irie, the japanese backstroke phenom, is an example of someone who has an ideal streamlined body, yet somehow manages to create enough power to be near world record times. I will say unequivocally that the swimmers who have the greatest distance per stroke also have the strongest kicks. Popov’s kick was no exception.

      Gary Sr.

  • Stratocaster

    James:
    Underwater cameras are placed in certain sections of the pool and the view is “calibrated”. Then using video, you can make such measurements.

    Gary:
    “Swimmers with the greatest distance per stroke also have the strongest kicks” seems to imply the increase the power to go faster model used by Biondi. Popov used 30% less propulsive power to go faster. Visually, it may appear he has a strong kick that is propelling him, but such a reduction in propulsive power to go faster could only be accomplished by a significant reduction in drag. The whole boat is using less power to go faster, it’s not the arms doing less because the legs are doing more comparison.

    The 24 watts of propulsive power that Popov used converts to only 17.7 lbs. of force.

  • http://www.theraceclub.com Gary Sr

    Stratocaster,

    I don’t understand how they could derive power from video imaging, however, I still say that the difference in power between these swimmers would not surprise me as drag has such a huge influence on body speed. The power one generates from the arm pull is not just dependent on the power of the arm, but also on the force generated by the counter-rotation of the body and legs. The legs also move at three times the rate of the arms and capable of generating a lot of power.
    One can get great distance per stroke with little power or kick when swimming very slowly. At the speed Popov and Biondi were swimming, longer distance per stroke generally means stronger kick, holding in front longer and slower stroke rate. My guess is that Popov took fewer strokes than Biondi.

    Gary Sr.

    • http://www.aquadonis.ch Nico Messer

      I think what they’re doing (even at European Junior Championships sometimes) is they have camera placed all over different places at the pool (over and under water) with control points like the 15m mark. They then analyse most races (finals mostly) and hand out a paper with the times for each swimmer at the specific check points, stroke rates and from there they derive those other values. Had it done for one of my 50 free races.

  • Steve

    One thing you’ll probably never see is a weak kicker with respectible 50/100M times. Take a jet engine for example, most of the thrust comes from the fan blades up front, yet the bulk of the engine consists of multiple compressor stages, among other things, for the added thrust achieved out the back end.

    Regarding Popov’s ability to swim so quick, in my opinion, even though other swimmers were faster (e.g. Hall), calculated efficiency was what made him so tough to beat. He also exhibited some extreem levels of flexibility too which probably contributed to lack of drag.

    • http://www.aquadonis.ch Nico Messer

      You’re absolutely right about the kicking part. Both Gary Jr. and Popov were exceptional kickers! But the kicking part is getting more and more important for longer distances as well. Nowadays you see even a lot of the 1500m guys going a steady 6 beat kick the whole way. That’s why you shouldn’t underestimate the importance of kicking in practice. We have at least one out of every four practices with a heavy kick focus.